- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
-
Well, you can still be a winner in comparison if you don´t actively partake in the fighting, none of your stuff gets really broken and the remaining side wants to be your buddy afterwards for a whole bunch of strategic and geopolitical reasons. Winning the war by avoiding the battles sounds like a sweet option! Fun fact: If there are three world wars you only have to win the last one. Who knew
Besides, does anybody in the intelligence community of burgerland like riddles? Like some cryptic compilation of images? Like on Rothschild´s The Economist magazine cover? Well, I´m actually far too lazy to make one right now and all you get is a bunch of pictures but in turn the riddle is super simple (contains spoilers)
Maybe this current insane nonsense in Syria will be resolved by having a last-minute de-escalation like the last time under the Obama administration… but maybe it won´t.
So yeah, I had some hope that your new president would somehow manage to ultimatly outsmart the most aggressive elements in your military-industrial complex (and complete the system of idealism as a stretch goal), but since that´s clearly not the road we´re on, I´m pretty comfortable with our inofficial Plan B (allegedly, allegedly). I mean it´s better than being on the receiving end of some pretty impressive and nasty surprises, I can tell you this much. I got the memo from Henry Gruver and Steve Quayle and I prefer not to be in that picture. So at least we won´t need two million sunblock and we can instead ensure some great trading opportunities (the shipmasters of Hamburg and Breme might shed some tears though ). You got that cup filled on your own, you go ahead and drink it alone.Always look On The bright side of life. Дружба
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Our audio podcast channel on 
